Hello again,
If you are
still with me: kudos (this is by no means congratulatory, I am referring to the
granola bar: they pay me to say it); it was never my attempt to give a lecture,
but it hardly seemed appropriate to celebrate a monumental time in the history
of design without paying respects to those who came before—so without further
ado: a moment of silence (mind your hats gentlemen).
… And we’re
back. First published in the February 1945 issue of “Arts and Architecture”
magazine, 10152 Toluca Lake Avenue was the first of the Case Study Houses. This
residence, as originally designed by Mr. Davidson, was never build; however, a
revised version of the plans would be constructed three years later. Both will
be covered in this article: the former being the primary topic of discussion.
Originally
this residence had no client, so someone with too much time on their hands,
mocked up a hypothetical family with hypothetical expectations for a modern
residence. This attractive family consists of: an older, independently
professional couple, Mr. and Mrs. Abel, their teenage daughter who is
frequently off at school, we’ll call Trudy, and everybody’s favorite: a live-in
mother-in-law who we will affectionately refer to as Mrs. Vickers. The players
are set, now for the stage.
For the interest of the reader, I have taken a few liberties with the narrative to follow: but what fun is life without a little imagination. You will notice that the characters and interactions are fictitious; HOWEVER, all observations in references to the architect, architecture and overall design aesthetics are absolutely true. If nothing else, these “faux-interviews” will serve to make the analyses of these homes a little less tedious and a little more tantalizing for the reader as well as the writer.
“Hollywood
Hideout”
The weather
is exactly how I remember it to be for North Hollywood at this time of year, so
too was the traffic. Nevertheless, I continue up the sinuous walk of the Abel
Residence. I am greeted at the door by a rather established-looking couple and
am beckoned inward.
With a perpendicular garage, the house seems to
embrace the visitor upon approach.
|
The living
room is expertly adorned with various pieces by: Eileen Gray, Corbusier and the
Eames—their tubular steel components serving to accentuate the bountiful
natural light pouring in from the floor-to-ceiling window at the rear of the
house. Most notable in terms of the living room, is the way in which the ceiling edge is
chamfered above the mantle with inlayed rail lighting allowing for a diffuse means of bathing the room with artificial light; when the generous
California sun has set, that is.
“It wasn’t
easy parting with our loft in LA. We had grown accustom to snug quarter and
proximity to our respective places of employment, but we are getting older and
coming to terms with the idea of retirement. Trudy comes and goes in between
semesters at USC and the arrival of my Mother-in-law brought new demands. We
thought a change of scenery would go us some good.” Mrs. Abel brings over a tray of
lemonade and chimes in, “But budget was a big concern. Being long-time renters,
we were terrified of taking on a mortgage especially because at our age it
would probably outlive us.”
With these things in mind, the couple commissioned local architect Julius Davidson
who took to heart the needs and expectations of his new clients.
At first
glace the home is a rather conventional one, composed of a wood structure set
on a concrete slab. But, as the Abels point out, the magic is in the details.
For the other components of the house Davidson utilized materials traditionally
used for more industrial building typologies. Aluminum sheets for siding,
plywood for cabinetry and other treatments, asphalt tile flooring, factory-made steel trusses for the roof and Formica countertops over which we share lemonade.
“Davidson spared not expense in reducing the expense of the project,” Mr. Abel
states with a smile.
Along with
appeasing the couple’s desire for a relatively inexpensive house, the architect
made several concessions for the programmatic elements of the house: some, the
Abels had stipulated, and others the they didn’t even know they wanted.
A private
suite on the second floor for Mrs. Abel’s mother with a separate terrace
and balcony overlooking the entry, an office/ dormitory for daughter Trudy, and
plenty of outdoor space for entertaining or gardening in the case of Mrs.
Abel and her mother: who both possess green thumbs I am told.
The rear terrace with exposed structural steel trellis provides
ample space for: dinner parties, sunbathing and gardening.
|
“We brought
our list of requirements to the architect thinking it would keep him busy, but
he came back with a list of things we had not considered,” Gregory reminisces.
Davidson went beyond the call of duty, not only complying with the couples
demands but also: orienting the house diagonally on the site to maximize solar gain, providing for cross ventilation in every bedroom and placing the
terraces in such a way that adjacent part of the building would protect against
the prevailing winds. “Worse that ants at a picnic are strong winds,” jokes
Mrs. Abel.
Mr. and Mrs.
Abel’s shifting family situation and professional outlook prompted an endeavor
into uncharted waters, but with the patient guidance and savvy design
sensibility of architect Julius Davidson, it would seem the couple’s search for
a change of scenery had done them plenty of good.
***
As mentioned
earlier, Julius Davidson did not build his initial scheme for CSH #1; however, a
revised version of the scheme was constructed on a different site three years
later. What follows are various drawing produce by Mr. Davidson for the revision of CSH #1.
The revised plans for CSH #1 by Julius Davidson |
The front elevation for the revised CSH #1 |
The rear elevation of the revised CSH #1 |
Until next time
No comments:
Post a Comment